URAL MOUNTAINS. The girdle of mountains which extends from the Arctic Ocean southwards nearly to the Caspian Sea, and is now regarded as separating Europe from Asia, was anciently the subject of various myths. Even the Slavonians, who in the 11th century frequently visited the region of the Urals for trade with the Ugrians (which people at that time lived there), described them as mountains reaching to the sky, intersected by terrible pre-cipices, and as being inhabited by a population of cave-dwellers. Although crossed by a continuous stream of Russian colonizers from the 16th century onwards, the Ural Mountains still retained something of their mythical character in Western literature, and in the 18th century they received from geographers the high-sounding designa-tion of montes dieti angulus terrse. The Russians describe them either as Kamen (stone) merely or by the appropriate name of Poyas (girdle), while the name of Urals ( Uraiy) derived either from the Ostiak urr (chain of mountains) or from the Turkish aral-tau or ural-tauhas with them become a generic name for extensive mountain chains. (See plate II. vol. xxi. and plate I. vol. xxii.).
Notwithstanding numerous scientific expeditions by which the exploration of various parts of the range began, to be undertaken from the earlier portion of the 19th. century, and notwithstanding partial accurate surveys and levellings and numerous geological researches made within, the last thirty years, the real structure of the Urals, both oro-graphical and geological, remains still imperfectly known. Even on maps otherwise good they are still very often represented as an unbroken chain, at least 1200 miles in length, running north and south from the Arctic Ocean to the sources of the river Ural. Rut every fresh addition to our knowledge has made it increasingly apparent that their real structure is much more complicated; and in view of recent explorations it becomes plain that the Urals con-sist of a series of several separate upheavals, some having a north-western direction and some a north-eastern, which reach their maximum heights along a zone which lies nearly north and south. They have thus some resemblance to the mountain-chains of Central Asia and Siberia,which also have north-eastern and north-western directions, but are grouped in zones which, roughly speaking, he west and east,although in both cases chains running either along meridians or along parallels are, wherever they exist at all, only rare exceptions.
The composite nature of the Urals is best seen at the northern and southern extremities of the system, where the upheavals assume the character of distinct chains of mountains. The Pai-hoi Mountains are a ridge which, beginning at the head of Kara Bay, runs north-west, and is continued in the Island of Vaigatch and the southern island of Nova Zembla ; and the Northern Urals, which join the Pai-hoi chain at the head of Kara Bay, run north-east and south-west as far south as 64° N. lat. In their middle portion the architecture of the Urals is complicated by the plateaus of middle Russia. The southern parts do not consist, as Humboldt supposed, of ramifications from main meridional chain, but of a series of parallel ranges running distinctly from north-east to south-west, as is plainly seen in the excellent maps recently published by the Russian Geological Committee. The structure of the separate parts of the Ural complexus is explained in some detail below.
I. The Pai-hoi or coast ridge (Samoyedic "stony ridge") is quite independent of the Urals proper, from which it is separated by a marshy- tundra, some 30 miles wide. It has a distinct north-north, westerly and north-westerly trend along the shores of the Eara Sea ; and, although it is cut by the Ugrian Strait, there is no doubt
that it is continued in Vaigatch Island and NOVA ZEMBLA (q.v.). Its dome-shaped summits, which attain a height of about 1000 feet above the tundra (Vozaipai, 1312 feet), are completely bare of trees, and its stony crags are separated by broad marshy tundras. It is uninhabited.
II. The Obdorsk or Northern Urals, which begin within a few miles of the head of Kara Bay (Konstantinoff Kameh, in 68° 30' N. lat, 1490 feet), and extend in a south-western direction as far as the 64th parallel, form a distinct ridge of mountains, stony and craggy, sloping steeply towards the south-east and gently to-wards the marshes of Russia. Its highest elevations are on the 66th and 67th parallels (3600 to 4370 feet). Sometimes the main chain has on the west two or three secondary ones, formed by the upheaval of sedimentary rocks, and it is towards the southern ex-tremity of one of those that the highest peaks of the Urals occur (Sablya, 5407 feet, in 64° 47' N. lat., and Teplos-iz, 5540 feet, in 63° 55'). Dense coniferous forests, consisting chiefly of fir, pine, and larch, cover the slopes of the mountains and the narrow valleys; but, as the less hospitable latitudes are approached, every species except the larch gradually disappears and the upper limit of vegeta-tion (2400 feet in the south) rapidly descends till it reaches the very base of the mountains towards the Arctic Circle, and forest vegetation disappears altogether about 65° lat. (67° in the plains of Russia and Siberia). These inhospitable hill-tracts, rising from the wide tundras which stretch for hundreds of miles to the west and east of the Urals, are quite uninhabited, save for a few hunters, who visit them in the summer in pursuit of the reindeer which here seek refuge from the mosquitoes of the lowlands.
III. Although usually reckoned to the Northern Urals, the section between the 64th and 61st parallels has again a wholly distinct character. It is represented on the maps as a girdle of chains, 20 to 35 miles in width, running north and south, and separated by long valleys. From the broad plateaus, or parmas, which stretch to-wards the north-west, it might be conjectured, however, that the structure is more complicated ; and the recent researches by MM. Fedoroff and Ivanoff have, in fact, shown that what is described as the main chain (or, more correctly, the main water-parting) of the Urals is a succession of plateaus stretching in a north-westerly direction,1 wdth broad, flat, marshy valleys, and rising here and there into isolated dome-shaped flat summits, mostly under 3000 feet (Yang-tuny, 62° 43' N. lat, 4166 feet). The wdiole region, except the mountain summits, is densely clothed with coniferous forests, birch appearing only occasionally in the south, and even the Scotch pine only in a few valleys. This part of the range is also uninhabited.
IV. The Middle Urals, between 61° and 55° 30' N. lat., and
about 80 miles in breadth, are the best known, as they contain
the richest iron, copper, and gold mines (Bogostovsk, Gorobta-
godatsk, and Ekaterinburg Urals). The Deneshkin Kameft in the
north (4238 feet) and the Tara-tash in the south (2800 feet) may
be considered as marking the limits of this section. Here the oro-
graphical structure is still more complicated, and the necessity of
distinguishing the separate upheavals becomes still more apparent.
In the north (61st to 60th parallel) there is a succession of chains
with a distinct north-eastern trend ; and it still remains an open
question whether, for two degrees farther south, the whole of the
Bogostovsk Urals (5135 feet in the Konjakoff Kameft, and from
3000 to 4000 feet in several other summits) do not consist of chains
having the same direction. Farther south a broad swelling, which
crosses northern Russia from the Kanin peninsula in the north
to the sources of the river Petchora in the south-east, joins the
Urals, and is continued into Asia by the plateau of the Tura and
Isset rivers. To the south of the Katchkanar (2891 feet), i.e., from
the 58th to the 56th parallel, therefore, the Urals assume the ap-
pearance of broad swellings from 1000 to 2000 feet in height, deeply
ravined and wdth gentle slopes. These low and ravine-broken
plateaus, the higher parts of which can be reached from Russia on
a very gentle gradient, have been utilized for centuries as the chief
highway to Siberia. They have none of the aspects of an alpine
tract; and the traveller to Siberia cannot but experience a feeling
of disappointment as his horses, still running at full speed, reach
the marble column, inscribed " Europe " on one side and " Asia " on
the other, which marks the water-parting (1180 feet) between the
Russian and Siberian rivers. The eastern slope is steeper, but even
there Ekaterinburg is only 350 feet below the water-parting. The
valleys have a decidedly south-eastern direction, and such is also
the course of the railway from Perm to Tyumen, as soon as it
reaches the Siberian slope. The plateau -liko swellings of this
division terminate farther south in a depression, about 70 miles
broad, stretching from north-west to south-east, where the water-
parting has a height of only a few hundred feet. The Middle Urals
are still densely forested, notwithstanding the immense quantities
of timber and fuel which are constantly being taken from them.
The vegetation is much more varied than in the north (birch,
oak, lime, and maple), a rich undergrowth of bushes growing to-
gether with the conifers, and the banks of the rivers being adorned
1 See map in the Izvestut of the Russ. Geogr. Soc., vol. xxii., 18815.
with the wild cherry (Prunus padus), poplar, willow, and alder. The valleys and lower slopes are covered with a thick sheet of rich humus and have become the site of large and wealthy villages. The mines also have given rise to a considerable population. The southern parts of the Middle Urals may be estimated to have a total agricultural and mining population of nearly 1,500,000.
V. The Southern Urals (from 55° 30' to 51° N. lat.) are now well known both orographieally and geologically; and it appears that, instead of consisting of three chains of mountains radiating from Mount Yurma, as was formerly supposed, they consist of a series of three parallel chains running north-east and south-west, and therefore constitute a quite independent part of the Ural com-plexus. The Ural-tau proper is a low sinuous chain extending due south-west and hardly exceeding 2200 to 2800 feet in height. It slopes gently towards the north-west and abruptly towards the south-east, where several short and low chains (Ilmen, Irenty, &c.) rise in the basins of the Mias and the Ui. In the west a chain separated from the Ural-tau by a longitudinal valley accompanies it throughout its entire length. This, although pierced by the rivers which rise in the longitudinal valley just mentioned (Ai, upper Byetaya), nevertheless rises to a much greater height than the Ural-tau. Its wild stony ridge has an altitude of 3375 feet in the Yurma, and 3950 feet in the Taganai ; while the Urenga and Iremel Mountains exceed 3500 feet, and the peaks bearing these names reach 4013 and 5040 feet respectively. Farther west, another series of chains, parallel to the above, is described under various names (Zurat-kul, Zigatga, Nary) ; they reach nearly the same altitudes (Zigatga and Yamau-tau, 4880 and 5400 feet respect-ively). A number of other chains, also parallel and ranging from 2000 to 3000 feet, accompany them in the west. The whole system has thus the character of a swelling nearly 65 miles wide, inter-sected by a series of parallel chains, the results of as many foldings of the sedimentary rocks, which have undergone extensive denuda-tion. Some of the chains are exceedingly craggy, and most of them are covered with masses of angular débris, sometimes concealed under thick sheets of marshy mosses. The gorges by which the rivers pierce the Devonian limestones on their way towards the lower terraces are most picturesque in the west, where the Urals assume an alpine character. The forests are no longer continuous ; the gentle slopes of the hilly tracts are dotted with woods, mostly of deciduous trees, while the hollows contain rich pasture grounds. The thick layers of sedimentary rock which are lifted en masse on the western slope cover a wide area farther to the west in the shape of a plateau which already assumes the features of a steppe (see UFA). The whole region, formerly the abode of Bashkirs, is rapidly being colonized by Russians.
Farther south, between the 53d and 51st parallels, the Ural-tau, still composed of crystalline rocks (diorite, serpentine, granite), continues in the same direction, but is covered as we advance by horizontal Cretaceous deposits and, except when deeply trenched by rivers, assumes the appearance of a plateau which hardly reaches 1500 feet. It is continued farther south-west (towards the Volga) under the name of Obschiy Syrt. A narrow longitudinal valley watered by the Sakmara (right-hand tributary of the Ural) separates the Ural-tau and the Guberlinsk Mountains (as the preceding tract is called) from the Irendyk chain, about 20 miles in wddth, which reaches 2300 feet in its higher parts. It is cut by the Ural river at Orsk and extends farther south-west towards the sources of the Ilek ; while in the east a wide granitic plateau, with only a few remainders of its former Devonian and Carboniferous covering, some 130 miles broad and nearly 1000 feet high, lies about the sources of the Siberian rivers, and is known by such local names as Kara-Edyr-tau, Djabik-Karagai, and the like.
VI. As a rule the Urals are not shown on maps to the south of the great bend of the Ural river, where quite independent ranges of hills, or flat swellings, are represented (Jaman-tau, Mugojar Hills). It appears, however, from recent exploration that the Mugojar Hills may safely be regarded as a farther continuation of the upheavals which constitute the Urals. The Cretaceous plateau north of the Ural river is continued to the south of it ; it again assumes a mountainous character in the Jaman-tau (50' N. lat.) and joins the Mugojar Hills, which consist of diorites and crystalline slates and reach their maximum in the Airuk Mountain (about 1000 feet). A range of heights connects the Mugojar Hills with the Ust-Urt plateau (see TRANSCASPIAN REGION). It is hardly necessary to say that these plateaus and flat hills to the south of the river Ural have all the characters of the Ciscaspian and Transcaspian steppes.
Geology.Whatever the variety of the orographieally independent systems of mountains and plateaus embodied under the general name of Urals, a certain " geotectonic " similarity maybe observed in all of them. Denudation has been active on so grand a scale that entire strata of sedimentary deposits have been removed from their original positions aud scattered in the form of débris to distances of more than 100 miles on both sides of the Urals, so as
considerably to reduce their former height. But, if this agency be taken into account, the Urals seem to come under the category of what the Germans call asymmetric Faltengebirge, and thus exhibit a great resemblance to the western Alps. A broad strip of granites, syenites, diorites, and porphyries, with their subordinate gneisses and crystalline slates, belonging to the Laurentian and Huronian systems, constitutes the main axis of upheaval, and this axis is invariably situated in the eastern part of the mountain region. The asymmetry thus resulting is the more pronounced as the Azoic rocks are mostly covered directly by Tertiary and Quaternary deposits on their Siberian slope ; while towards the west they are covered with vast layers of Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous, Permian, and Triassic rocks, which are manifoldly folded so as to constitute a series of chains parallel to the main axis and mostly lifted to much greater heights than the older Azoic rocks.
The crystalline rocks which must have constituted the primary ridges mostly appear in the shape of plateaus, water- and glacier-worn, with undulating surfaces; and the hills which rise above the plateaus are mostly dome-shaped and are seldom marked by the craggy characters which are met with in the limestone and sandstone mountains of the subsequent formations. Masses of angular debris and great blocks cover both the plateaus and the mountains ; and only a very few traces of the sediments which may have partially covered the Azoic crystalline rocks are sporadically met with. But, as a rule, they have remained a continent since the Huronian epoch. As for the Primary and Secondary deposits of the western slope, they are represented by Silurian, Devonian, Carboniferous, Permio - Carboniferous, Permian, and Triassic deposits, attaining great thicknesses and following one another in succession so as to appear on the surface as strips lying parallel to the Urals. The strip occupied by the Silurian quartzites, limestones, and slates is narrow, even in its northern portion. Farther south it disappears, and the deposits which formerly were assigned to the Silurian period are now considered to be mostly Devonian. These latter, mostly littoral in character and much resembling those of the Eifel and Belgium, occupy wide areas to the west of the main axis of the Urals. Their lower parts are much metamorphosed. The Car-boniferous deposits,coal-bearing in the Middle and Southern Urals, although appearing at the surface only as a narrow strip in the west Urals, occupy an extensive area, but are concealed by the largely developed Permian deposits, and that series of sediments which must be considered as intermediate between the Carboniferous and the Permian. These latter, described as " Permo - Carbon " by Kussian and German geologists, are largely developed in the west Urals. Their fossils belong to a fauna intermediate between the Carboniferous and the Permian, which was formerly known as that of Artinsk ; but since two more series of the same intermediate character have been described the wdiole has been brought under the general name of Permio-Carboniferous deposits. The Permian deposits cover a wide zone all along the western slope of the Urals from north to south, and are most important on account of their copper ores, salt-beds, and salt-springs. They are also covered with variegated marls wdiich are almost quite destitute of fossil organ-isms, so that their age is not yet quite settled. Some Russian geologists continue to consider them as Permian, while the ma-jority of recent explorers assign them to the Triassic age.
The glaciation of the Urals is still a debated question. Even those geologists who now acknowledge that the Scandinavian ice-sheet covered middle Russia hesitate to admit the existence of an ice-cap covering the Middle and Southern Urals,the want of polished and striated rocks being the chief argument for the nega-tive. But, if the disintegrated state of the rocks which are best fitted to maintain glacial polishing and striation, their thick coverings of dibris, and the action of lichens and mosses in obliterating the traces of glaciation be taken into account, as also the prevalence of erratic blocks, and the character of the deposits filling up the valleys, it must be regarded as most probable that the Urals, too, must soon be included within the limits of former glaciation (as has been already done by a few explorers, such as Polyakoff). The Lacustrine (Post-Glacial) deposits are widely spread all over the slopes of the Urals. Immense marshes, which have recently emerged, in the north, and numberless lakes in the south, which are but small in comparison with their size at a recent period, as also Lacustrine deposits in the valleys, all go to show that during the Lacustrine period the Urals were as much dotted with lakes as Finland is at the present time.
Climatic, Geo-Botanical, and Geo-Zoological Importance.The importance of the Urals as a climatic and geo-botanical boundary can no longer be regarded as very great. Most European species of plants freely cross the Urals into Siberia, and several Siberian species travel across them into northern Russia. But, being a zone of hilly tracts extending from north to south in a meridional direction, the Ural Mountains necessarily exercise a powerful in-fluence in driving a colder northern climate, as well as a northern flora and fauna, farther towards the south along their axis. The harshness of the climate at the meteorological stations of Bogo-Stovsk, Zlatoust, and Ekaterinburg is not owing merely to their elevation a few hundred feet above sea-level. Even if reduced to sea-level, the average temperatures of the Ural meteorological stations are such as to produce a local deflexion of the isotherms towards the south. The same is true with regard to the limits of distribution of vegetable and animal species. It has been already stated that the northern limits of tree - vegetation descend towards more southern latitudes on the Northern Urals and in the vicinity of the chain. The same is true with regard to many other species of plants. In like manner several Arctic species of animals come much farther south than they might otherwise have done: the reindeer, for instance, is met with as far south as the 52d parallel. The Southern Urals introduce amidst the Ciscaspian steppes the forest vegetation, flora, and fauna of middle Russia.
In the distribution of the races of mankind the Urals have also played an important part. To the present day the Northern Urals are the abodes of Finnish stems (Samoyedes, Zyrians, Voguls, and Permians) who have been driven from their former homes by Slavonian colonization, while the steppes on the slopes of the Southern Urals have continued to be inhabited by the Turkish stems of the Bashkirs. The Middle Urals were also in the 9th century the abode of the Ugrians, and their land, Biarmia (now Perm), was well known to the Byzantine historians for its mineral wealth,there being at that time a lively intercourse between the Ugrians and the Greeks. Compelled to abandon their abodes, they moved south on the Ural slopes towards the land of the Khazars, and through the prairies of south-eastern and southern Russia (the AefHeSLa of Constantine Porphyrogenitus) towards the Danube and to their present seatHungary,leaving but a very few memorials in the Northern and Middle Urals. At present the Urals, especially the Middle and the Southern, are being more and more colonized by Great Russian immigrants, while the Finnish stems are rapidly melting away.
Metallurgy and Alining.The mineral wealth of the Urals was known to the Greeks in the 9th century, and afterwards to the Novgorodians, who penetrated there in the 11th century for trade with the Ugrians. When the colonies of Novgorod (Vyatka, Perm) fell under the rule of Moscow, the Russian czars soon understood the importance of the Ural mines, and Ivan III. sent out German engineers to explore that region. In 1558 the whole of the present government of Perm was given by the rulers of Moscow to the brothers Strogonoff, who began to establish salt-works and mines for iron and copper. Peter I. gave a new impulse to the mining industry by founding several iron-works, and from 1745, when gold was first discovered, the Russian colonization of the Urals took a new departure. The colonization was, however, of a double character, being partly freechiefly by Nonconformists in search of religious freedom in the wdldernesses of the Uralsand partly compulsory,the Government sending peasant settlers who became serfs to the iron and copper works, and were bound to supply them wdth ores and wood for fuel. Until 1861 all work at the mines was done by serfs belonging either to private persons (the Strogonoffs, Demidoffs, and others) or to the crown. At present (1888) only a lew works, maintained for supplying the army, belong to the crown.
Gold is found both in veins and in alluvial or diluvial deposits, and is extracted from both ; but the former yield only a moderate quantity annually (2180 to 2780 lb in 1882-84). The gold from the Ural mines constitutes nearly one-fifth of the total amount obtained throughout the Russian empire. Platinum is found either in connexion with gold dust or separately, the platinum mines of the Urals being the only ones worked in Russia. Osmium, iridium, and nickel are found at several places, but their industrial import-ance is small. Silver is also met with at several places, but only 2383 lb were extracted during the years 1875 to 1884. The copper mines, chiefly in Perm, but partly also in Ufa, are very important, nearly two-thirds of the total amount of the metal mined in Russia being obtained from eight works in the Urals. The average amount of gold, platinum, and copper annually yielded by the Ural mines is given in the following table :
== TABLE ==
Iron is widely diffused and is extracted in the governments of Perm, Ufa, and Orenburg, the chief works being in Perm. Of the 198 blast furnaces in the Russian empire 103 are in the Urals, and they supply nearly two-thirds of all the pig-iron produced in Russia. One-half of the iron and one-sixth of the steel obtained both from home and foreign pig-iron in the empire are prepared in the Urals ; and, while the St Petersburg and Polish steel works, which prepare steel (chiefly for rails) from imported iron, show great fluctuations in their production, the Ural works have a steady
increase. The average yearly production of iron in the Urals is best seen from the following :
== TABLE ==
Owing to the immense extent of forest, the coal mining industry is but of recent origin in the Urals. Only six pits were at work in Perm in 1884 ; and of recent years from 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 cwts. have been annually extracted (about 5 per cent, of the coal raised in the Russian empire). Finally, salt was raised in Perm, Orenburg, and Uralsk to the amount of 9,422,000 cwts. in 1884.
The precious (amethyst, topaz, emerald, tourmaline, &c.) and ornamental (malachite, carsovite, &c.) stones of the Urals are familiar in all European museums, and are found in most beautiful varieties. Tire crown works at Ekaterinburg supply admirable works of art, while a numerous population at Ekaterinburg and in the neigh-bouring villages support themselves by searching for precious and ornamental stones and preparing them for export. Of the 330,750 workmen engaged in 1884 in mining and metallurgical industries throughout the Russian empire 183,914 were employed in the Urals, as well as nearly one-half of the motive power (steam-engines and water-wheels) used at the mining and metallurgical works of Russia, Poland, and Finland. The exports from the Urals are made chiefly by means of the rivers, which are navigable in their upper parts only during the spring. There is not as yet any railway connecting the Urals with Russia. The line of Siberian railway which now connects the iron-works of the eastern slope with the Kama at Perm has certainly increased the exports ; but they are still so small in comparison with the expense of the line that the railway is worked at a loss, the deficiency being made good from the imperial budget, and the wdiole mining and metal-lurgical industry of the Urals is still maintained by means of high protective duties imposed on foreign metals and metallic wares.
Several wealthy towns have grown up in the Ural valleys in connexion wdth mining industry and administration.. EKATERINBURG; \q.v.) and NLTNE-TAQHILSK (q.v.) both had more than 30,000 in-habitants in 1885, while ZLATOUST (q.v.), Neviansk, Neivinsk, and Kyshtym in Perm, Votkinsk and Izhevsk in Vyatka, had from 21,000 to 12,500 inhabitants. The Revdinsk, Bogostovsk, Turinsk, Suaitanovsk, Gorobtagodat, Artinsk, Nijne-Saldinsk, Usolie, and Sysertsk mining towns in Perm, Katav - Ivanovsk, Kusinsk, and Satkinsk in Ufa, Byetoryetsk, Tirlansk, and Avzyano - Petrovsk have populations from 5000 to 10,000.
Bibliography.1. The following general works may Ije mentioned as of chief
importance :Hermann, Versuch einer miner. Beschr. des Ural Erzgebirges, 1789 ;
Humboldt, Fragments, 1831 ; Hofmann and Helmersen, Geogn. Unters. des Sud-
Vralgebirges, 1831 ; Kupfter, Voyage, 1833 ; L. von Bueli, Beitr. zur Bestimm. der
Gcbirgsform. in Russland, 1810 ; Eversmann, Orenburg Region (Russian), 1840 ;
Sohurowsky, Urals (Russian), 1841 ; Helmersen, Reise, 1841 ; Rose, Reise, 1842 ;
Kurchison, Geol. of Russia, 1845 (with Ozerskiy's Appendix to Russ. transla-
tion);- Keyserling and Krusenstern, Wiss. Beobachtungen, 1846; Leonhardt,
Gwlogie des Eur. Russland, 1S48 ; Hofmann, Nbrdl. Ural, 1853-56 ; Meglitzky
and Antipoff, Bergbau im Ural, 1861 ; Ludwig, Ueberblkk und Beobaeht. in Russ-
land, 1862 ; Moller, Geological Map of the Urals, 1869 ; Ruprecht, Verbr. der
Pflanzen in nbrdl. Ural ; Panaeft, Climatology of the Urals (Russian), 1882 ;
Carte Géologique de la Russie d'Europe (139), 1886. For further bibliographical
information see "Ural," "Perm," "Orenburg," &e., in the Geographical Dic-
tionary (Russian) by P. Semenoti'. 2. Monographs dealing with separate parts
of the Urals occur in great numbers in the Gornyi Journal, the Verhandl. der
Russ. Miner. Ges., the publications of the Russ. Geogr. Soc, the Ural, Kazan,
and Moscow Societies of Naturalists, and in the Izvestia and Memoirs of the
Russ. Geological Committee. See also the yearly Indexes by M. Mezhoff and
those of the Kieff Society of Naturalists. (P. A. K.)
Carte Géologique Générale de la Russie d'Europe, sheet 139 ; and "Description Orographique," by A. Karpinsky and Th. Tehernyeheff, in Mémoires du Comité Géologique, vol. iii. No. 2, 1886.
Carte Géologique, sheet 139, ut sup.
P. Nazaroft', in Bull, de la Soc. des Naturalistes de Moscou, 1886, No. 4.
Comp. Moravia and the Madiars, by K. J. Groth; Zabyelin's History of Russian Life and the polemics on the subject in lzvestia of the Kuss. Geogr. Soc, xix., 188a